🚨BREAKING: Marco Rubio is terminating the legal status of Islamic terrorists and their family members who were allowed into America under Obama
Obama gave them the privilege of living here.
Trump is removing them.
Marco Rubio:
“Masoumeh Ebtekar – also known as “Screaming Mary” – was the spokeswoman for the Islamic terrorists who stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979 and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days – subjecting them to beatings, starvation, and mock executions.
In 2014, the Obama Administration granted visas to her son and his family to enter the United States. In June 2016, the Obama Administration gave them lawful permanent resident status via the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program.
This week, I terminated their lawful permanent resident status and today, Seyed Eissa Hashemi, Maryam Tahmasebi, and their son are now in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement pending their removal from our country.
Her family should never have been allowed to benefit from the extraordinary privilege of living in our country.
America can never become home for anti-American terrorists or their families – and under the Trump Administration, it never will.”
In a recent development, the Trump administration has launched a stringent initiative aimed at terminating the legal status of individuals identified as Islamic terrorists, as well as their family members. According to official statements, these individuals were granted entry and residency within the United States during the Obama administration.
The core of this policy is anchored in the assertion that the previous administration inadvertently created pathways for individuals associated with hostile foreign regimes or extremist networks to reside comfortably in America. Under the new directives spearheaded by officials like Marco Rubio, the U.S. government is actively reviewing the immigration status of these residents. The underlying premise of this crackdown is the conviction that the United States must not serve as a sanctuary for those who oppose its values or engage in anti-American rhetoric and activities.
This initiative has sparked significant debate across the political spectrum.
Proponents of the move argue that national security takes precedence over any humanitarian concerns for the relatives of known combatants or propagandists. They contend that the revocation of legal status is a necessary measure to protect the homeland and enforce stricter vetting protocols for foreign nationals who have ties to entities hostile to the U.S.
Conversely, critics express concern over the potential for overreach or the targeting of individuals based on familial associations rather than personal misconduct. There are also legal and procedural questions regarding the due process rights of those whose green cards or legal residency status are being revoked, especially if they have not been charged with a crime directly.
As the situation evolves, the Department of Homeland Security and associated agencies are moving forward with these removals, emphasizing that the U.S. border and immigration systems will not be exploited by foreign nationals connected to anti-American terrorist regimes. This development marks a pivotal shift in the nation’s approach to immigration enforcement and counter-terrorism.
